| Peer-Reviewed

Mechanisms of Drought Tolerance in Coffee (Coffea arabica L.): Implication for Genetic Improvement Program: Review

Received: 17 May 2023    Accepted: 2 June 2023    Published: 27 June 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Drought is a limiting factor of coffee production and industry worldwide which result 40-80% yield loses. The most substantial solution for this factor is developing tolerant coffee variety. In order to design genetic improvement program, understanding the mechanisms exhibited by drought tolerant and desirable traits involved in coffee genotypes under drought stress is priority issue. Thus, the present review article was conducted with the intension to assess and to understand the drought tolerance mechanisms revealed in coffee for further genetic improvement program. So far, the achieved research results on drought tolerance mechanisms of coffee such as morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanisms were clearly discussed in this article. Drought tolerant coffee genotypes exhibited deep root, reduce leaf area and even shade leaf, control on stomatal conductance and leaf transpiration under water deficit. Under drought stress, several biochemical accumulation such as sugar, amino acid, carbon metabolism enzymes Viz sucrose synthase and phosphofructokinase were confirmed in drought tolerant coffee which favor osmoregulation and enable desiccation tolerance. Coffee breeders’ experts should be conscious these desirable traits during coffee genetic improvement for drought tolerance. In Arabica coffee, CaERF017 is the most expressed gene under low temperature and drought stress. Generally, many genes identified in Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora that response to drought stress which are essential for intra and inter- cross for genetic enhancement and developing drought tolerant coffee variety.

Published in American Journal of BioScience (Volume 11, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajbio.20231103.12
Page(s) 63-70
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Biochemical, Coffee, Drought Tolerance, Molecular, Morphological, Physiological

References
[1] Menezes-Silva PE, Cavatte PC, Martins SCV, Reis JV, Pereira LF, Ávila RT et al. Wood density, but not leaf hydraulic architecture, is associated with drought tolerance in clones of Coffea canephora. Trees. 2015; 29 (6): 1687-1697.
[2] Davis AP, Tosh J, Ruch N, Fay MF. Growing coffee: Psilanthus (Rubiaceae) subsumed on the basis of molecular and morphological data; implications for the size, morphology, distribution and evolutionary history of Coffea. Bot J Linn Scociety. 2011; 167 (4): 357-377.
[3] DaMatta FM, Ronchi CP, Maestri M, Barros RS. Coffee: environment and crop physiology. In: DaMatta FM, editor. Ecophysiology of tropical tree crops. New York: Nova Science Publishers. 2010; 181-216.
[4] DaMatta FM, Chaves ARM, Pinheiro HA, Ducatti C, Loureiro ME. Drought tolerance of two field-grown clones of Coffea canephora. Plant Sci. 2003; 164 (1): 111-117.
[5] DaMatta FM. Exploring drought tolerance in coffee: a physiological approach with some insights for plant breeding. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2004; 16 (1): 1-6.
[6] Wang Q, Wu J, Lei T, He B, Wu Z, Liu M et al. Temporal-spatial characteristics of severe drought events and their impact on agriculture on a global scale. Quat Int. 2014; 349: 10-21.
[7] Kebede A, Kang MS, Bekele E. Advances in mechanisms of drought tolerance in crops, with emphasis on barley. Adv Agron. 2019; 156: 265-314.
[8] Reynolds MP, Mujeeb-Kazi A, Sawkins M. Prospects for utilising plant-adaptive mechanisms to improve wheat and other crops in drought- and salinity-prone environments. Ann Appl Biol. 2005; 146 (2): 239-259.
[9] Gosal SS, Wani SH, Kang MS. Biotechnology and drought-tolerance. J Crop Improv. 2009; 23 (1): 19-54.
[10] Pang J, Turner NC, Khan T, Du YL, Xiong JL, Colmer TD et al. Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to terminal drought: leaf stomatal conductance, pod abscisic acid concentration, and seed set. J Exp Bot. 2017; 68 (8): 1973-1985.
[11] Kufa T, Burkhardt J. Variations in leaf water potential in wild Ethiopian Coffea arabica accessions under contrasting nursery environments. J Agron. 2011; 10: 1-11.
[12] Caine RS, Yin X, Sloan J, Harrison EL, Mohammed U, Fulton T et al. Rice with reduced stomatal density conserves water and has improved drought tolerance under future climate conditions. New Phytol. 2019; 221 (1): 371-384.
[13] Carr MKV. The water relations and irrigation requirements of coffee. Exp Agric. 2001; 37 (1): 1-36.
[14] Silva EA, Mazzafera P, Brunini O, Sakai E, Arruda FB, Mattoso LHC et al. The influence of water management and environmental conditions on the chemical composition and beverage quality of coffee beans. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2005; 17 (2): 229-238.
[15] Toker C, Canci H, Yildirim T. Evaluation of perennial wild Cicer species for drought resistance. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2007; 54 (8): 1781-1786.
[16] Chauhan BS, Mahajan KPG, Randhawa RK, Singh H, Kang MS. Global warming and its impact on agriculture in India. Adv Agron. 2014; 123: 65-121.
[17] Mir RR, Zaman-Allah M, Sreenivasulu N, Trethowan R, Varshney RK. Integrated genomics, physiology and breeding approaches for improving droughttolerance in crops. Theor Appl Genet. 2012; 125 (4): 625-645.
[18] DaMatta FM, Ramalho JDC. Impacts of drought and temperature stress on coffee physiology and production: a review. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2006; 18 (1): 55-81.
[19] Kufa T. Environmental sustainability and coffee diversity in Africa. Paper Presented in the ICO World Coffee Conference. Guatemala City; February 26-28; 2010.
[20] Marraccini P, Felipe V, Gabriel SCA, Humberto JOR, Sonia E, Natalia GV et al. Differentially expressed genes and Protien upon drought acclimation in tolerance and sensitive genotypes of Coffee canephora. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63: 695-709.
[21] Mazzafera P. Water stress and consequences on coffee seed composition and beverage quality. In: Garcia Salva TJ, Guerreiro Filho O, Thomaziello RA, Fazuoli LC, editors. Quality coffee: technological, scientific and commercial aspects. Campinas, SP, Brazil: Institute of American Cultures. 2007; 73-90.
[22] Montagnon C, Leroy T. Re´ action a` la se´ cheresse de jeunes cafe´ Iers Coffea Canephora de Coˆ te-d’ivoire appartenant a` diffe´ rents groupes ge´ ne´ tiques. Cafe´ Cacao The. 1993; (37): 179-190.
[23] Montagnon C. Optimisation des gains ge´ ne´ tiques dans le sche´ ma de se´ lection re´ currente re´ ciproque de Coffea Canephora Pierre [PhD thesis]. France: Montpellier University; 2000.
[24] Marraccini P, Freire LP, Alves GSC, Vieira NG, Vinecky F, Elbelt S et al. RBCS1 expression in coffee: Coffea orthologs, Coffea arabica homeologs, and expression variability between genotypes and under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2011; 11: 85.
[25] Anderson JT, Wagner MR, Rushworth CA, Prasad KVSK, Mitchell-Olds T. The evolution of quantitative traits in complex environments. Heredity. 2014; 112 (1): 4-12.
[26] Edmeades GO. Progress in achieving and delivering drought tolerance in maize—an update. Ithaca, NY: International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (international service for the acquisition of Agri-biotech applications). 2013; 44.
[27] Blum A. Plant breeding for water-limited environment. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2011.
[28] Forster BP, Ellis RP, Moir J, Talame V, Sanguineti MC, Tuberosa R et al. Genotype and phenotype associations with 304 Amare Kebede et al. droughttolerance in barley tested in North Africa. Ann Appl Biol. 2004; 144: 157-168.
[29] Simkin AJ, Moreau H, Kuntz M, Pagny G, Lin C, Tanksley S et al. An investigation of carotenoid biosynthesis in Coffea canephora and Coffea arabica. J Plant Physiol. 2008; 165 (10): 1087-1106.
[30] Lopes MS, Araus JL, Van Heerden PD, Foyer CH. Enhancing drought tolerance in C4 crops. J Exp Bot. 2011; 62 (9): 3135-3153.
[31] Bashir SS, Hussain A, Hussain SJ, Wani OA, Zahid Nabi S, Dar NA et al. Plant drought stress tolerance: understanding its physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanisms. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2021; 35 (1): 1912-1925.
[32] Silva PCD, Junior WQR, Ramos MLG, Rocha OC, Veiga AD, Silva NH; et al. Physiological changes of arabica coffee under different intensities and durations of water stress in the Brazilian Cerrado. Plants (Basel). 2022; 11 (17): 2198.
[33] Mofatto SL, Carneiro AF, Vieira GN, Duarte EK, Vidal OR, Alekcevetch CJ et al. Identification of candidate genes for drought tolerance in coffee by high through put sequencing in the shoot apex of different Coffea arabica L. cultivars. BMC Plant Biol. 2016; 16: 1-18.
[34] Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS. Understanding Plant responses to drought from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol. 2003; 30 (3): 239-264.
[35] Pinheiro HA, Damatta FM, Chaves AR, Loureiro ME, DucattI C. Drought Tolerance is Associated with Rooting Depth and stomatal Control of water Use in Clones of Coffea canephora. Ann Bot. 2005; 96 (1): 101-108.
[36] Vu N, Park J, Nguyen N, Nguyen T, Kim I, Jang D. Enhanced drought tolerance of arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) by grafting method. Sains Malays. 2021; 50 (11): 3219-3229.
[37] Vu NT, Park JM, Tran AT, Bui TK, Vu DC, Jang DC et al. Effect of water stress on the growth and physiology of coffee plants. J Agric Life Environ Sci. 2018; 2018: 121-130.
[38] Da Matta FM, Maestri M, Barros RS, Regazzi AJ. Water relations of coffee leaves (Coffea arabica and C. canephora) in response to drought. J Hortic Sci. 1993; 68 (5): 741-746.
[39] Golberg AD, Bierny O, Renard C. Evolution compare des parameters hydriques chez Coffea canephora Pierreet l’hybride Coffea arabusta Capot et Ake Assi. Cafe cacao. 1984; 23: 257-266.
[40] Santos AB, Mazzafera P, Are Highly D. Dehydrins Are Highly Expressed in waterstressed plants of two coffee species. Trop Plant Biol. 2012; 5 (3): 218-232.
[41] Brodribb TJ, Jordan GJ. Internal coordination between hydraulics and stomatal control in leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 2008; 31 (11): 1557-1564.
[42] Tyree MT, Davis SD, Cochard H. Biophysical perspectives of xylem evolution: is there a trade-off to hydraulic efficiency for vulnerability to dysfunction? Int Assoc Wood Anat J. 1994; 15 (4): 335-360.
[43] Boyer J. Etude expe´ rimentale des effets du re´ gime d’humidite´ du sol sur la croissance ve´ ge´ tative, [la floraison et la fructification des cafe´ Iers robusta. Cafe´ cacao the]. 1969; 13: 187-200.
[44] Joshi R, Singh B, Bohra A et al. Salt stress signaling pathways: specificity and crosstalk. In: Wani SH, Hossain MA, editors. Managing salinity tolerance in plants: mo-lecular and genomic perspectives. Boca. Raton, Fl: CRC Press. 2016; 51-78.
[45] Menezes-Silva PE, Sanglard LMVP, Ávila RT, Morais LE, Martins SCV, Nobres P et al. Photosynthetic and metabolic acclimation to repeated drought events play key roles in drought tolerance in coffee. J Exp Bot. 2017; 68 (15): 4309-4322.
[46] Blum A. Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential – are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive. Aust J Agric Res. 2005; 56 (11): 1159-1168.
[47] Dias PC, Araujo WL, Moraes GABK, Barros RS, DaMatta FM. Morphological and physiological responses of two coffee progenies to soil water availability. J Plant Physiol. 2007; 164 (12): 1639-1647.
[48] Bashar MK, Akter K, Iftekharuddaula KM, Ali MS. Genetics of leaf water potential and its relationship with drought avoidance components in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Biol. Sci 2003; 13: 760-765.
[49] Kufa T, Burkhardt J. Hydraulic conductance of Wild arabica coffee populations in Monate rainforest of Ethiopia. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on coffee science colloquium, Sept. 11-15. Montpellier, France. 2006; 1064-1070.
[50] Kufa T, Burkhardt J, Goldhach H. Ecophysiological variability of forest arabica coffee populations in hydraulic characteristics along a climatic gradient in Ethiopia: morphological and Physiological variability. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on coffee science, (ASIC), October 11-15. Bangalore, India. 2004; 929-939.
[51] Nolf M, Creek D, Duursma R, Holtum J, Mayr S, Choat B. Stem and leaf hydraulic properties are finely coordinated in three tropical rainforest tree species. Plant Cell Environ. 2015; 38 (12): 2652-2661.
[52] Harris K, Subudhi PK, Borrell A, Jordan D, Rosenow D, Nguyen H et al. Sorghum stay-green QTL individually reduce post-flowering drought-induced leaf senescence. J Exp Bot. 2007; 58 (2): 327-338.
[53] Ramos LCDS, Carvalho A. Shoot and root evaluations on seedlings from Coffea genotypes. Bragantia. 1997; 56 (1): 59-68.
[54] Praxedes SC, DaMatta FM, Loureiro ME, Loureiro EM, Cordeiro AT, Antonio T et al. Effects of long-term soil drought on photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism in mature robusta coffee (Coffea Canephora Pierre var. kouillou) leaves. Environ Exp Bot. 2006; 56 (3): 263-273.
[55] Burkhardt J, Beining A, Kufa T, Goldbach HE. Different drought adaptation strategies of Coffea arabica populations along a rainfall gradient in Ethiopia. In: Asch F, Becker M, editors. Prosperity and poverty in a globalized world – challenges for agricultural research. Bonn, Germany: Tropentag; 2006.
[56] Tausend PC, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC. Water utilization, plant hydraulic properties and xylem vulnerability in three contrasting coffee (Coffea arabica) cultivars. Tree Physiol. 2000b; 20 (3): 159-168.
[57] Tausend PC, Meinzer FC, Goldstein G. Control of transpiration in three coffee cultivars: the role of hydraulic and crown architecture. Trees. 2000a; 14 (4): 181-190.
[58] Silvente S, Sobolev AP, Lara M. Metabolite adjustments in drought tolerant and sensitive soybean genotypes in response to water stress. PLOS ONE. 2012; 7 (6): e38554.
[59] Barnaby JY, Kim M, Bauchan G, Bunce J, Reddy V, Sicher RC. Drought responses of foliar metabolites in three maize hybrids differing in water stress tolerance. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8 (10): e77145.
[60] Pinheiro C, Chaves MM, Ricardo PC. Alteration in carbon and nitrogen metabolism induced by water deficit in the stem and leaves of Lupinus albus L. J Exp Biol. 2001; 52: 1063-1070.
[61] Lo Bianco R, Rieger M, Sung SS. Effects of drought on sorbitol and sucrose metabolism in sinks and sources of peach. Physiol Plant. 2000; 108 (1): 71-78.
[62] Guo P, Baum M, Grando S, Ceccarelli S, Bai G, Li R et al. Differentially expressed genes between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive barley genotypes in response to drought stress during the reproductive stage. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60 (12): 3531-3544.
[63] Duvick DN. The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Adv Agron. 2005; 86: 83-145.
[64] Bhanu AN, Singh MN, Srivastava K, Hemantaranjan A. Molecular mapping and breeding of physiological traits. Advances in Plants & Agriculture Research. 2016; 3: 10-5406.
[65] Jensen RG, Bahr JT. Ribulose 1, 5- bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1977; 28 (1): 379- 400.
[66] Feller U, Anders I, Mae T. Rubiscolytics: fate of RuBisCO after its enzymatic function in a cell is terminated. J Exp Bot. 2008; 59 (7): 1615-1624.
[67] Makino A. RuBisCO and nitrogen relationships in rice. Leaf photosynthesis and plant growth. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2003; 49 (3): 319-327.
[68] Spreitzer RJ. Role of the small subunit in ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003; 414 (2): 141-149.
[69] Ramachandra Reddy AR, Chaitanya KV, Vivekanandan M. Drought induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J Plant Physiol. 2004; 161 (11): 1189-1202.
[70] Sasi S, Venkatesh J, Daneshi RF, Gururani MA. Photosystem II extrinsic proteins and their putative role in abiotic stress tolerance in higher plants. Plants (Basel). 2018; 7 (4): 100.
[71] Pérez-Bueno ML, Barón M, García. Luque, I. PsbO, PsbP, and PsbQ of photosystem II are encoded by gene families in Nicotiana benthamiana. Structure and functionality of their isoforms. Photosynthetica. 2011; 49: 573-580.
[72] Choudhury FK, Rivero RM, Blumwald E, Mittler R. Reactive oxygen species. abiotic stress and stress combination. Plant J. 2017; 90 (5): 856-867.
[73] Silva VA. Caracterizacxa˜ o fisiolo´ gica da toleraˆ ncia a` seca em Coffea Canephora: contribuicxa˜ o relativa do sistema radicular e da parte ae´ rea [PhD thesis]. Brazil: Federal University of Vicxosa. 2007; 68.
[74] Alves GSC, Torres LF, Déchamp E, Breitler JC, Joët T, Gatineau F et al. Differential fine-tuning of gene expression regulation in coffee leaves by CcDREB1D promoter haplotypes under water deficit. J Exp Bot. 2017; 68 (11): 3017-3031.
[75] Alves GSC, Torres LF, de Aquino SO, Reichel T, Freire LP, Vieira NG et al. Nucleotide diversity of the coding and promoter regions of DREB1D, a candidate gene for drought tolerance in Coffea species. Trop Plant Biol. 2018; 11 (1-2): 31-48.
[76] Torres LF, Reichel T, Déchamp E, de Aquino SO, Duarte KE, Alves GSC et al. DREB-like genes are differentially expressed in drought-tolerant and susceptible clones of C. canephora subjected to different abiotic stress. Trop Plant Biol. 2019; 12 (2): 98-116.
[77] Santos OM, Coelho SL, Carvalho RG, Botelho EC, Torres FL, Vilela MJD et al. Photochemical efficiency correlated with candidate gene expression promote coffee drought tolerance, Scientific. Reporter. 2021; 7436.
[78] Rudenk NN, Borisova-Mubaraks hina MM, Ignatova KL, Fedorchuk PT, Nadeeva Zhurikova ME, Ivanov NB. Chapter role of plant carbonic anhydrases under stress conditions. Plant Stress Physiol. 2022: 1-25.
[79] Cruz F, Kalaoun S, Nobile P, Colombo C, Almeida J, Barros LMG et al. Evaluation of coffee reference genes for relative expression studies by quantitative real- time RT-PCR. Mol Breeding. 2009; 23 (4): 607-616.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Dawit Merga, Lemi Beksisa. (2023). Mechanisms of Drought Tolerance in Coffee (Coffea arabica L.): Implication for Genetic Improvement Program: Review. American Journal of BioScience, 11(3), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20231103.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Dawit Merga; Lemi Beksisa. Mechanisms of Drought Tolerance in Coffee (Coffea arabica L.): Implication for Genetic Improvement Program: Review. Am. J. BioScience 2023, 11(3), 63-70. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20231103.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Dawit Merga, Lemi Beksisa. Mechanisms of Drought Tolerance in Coffee (Coffea arabica L.): Implication for Genetic Improvement Program: Review. Am J BioScience. 2023;11(3):63-70. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20231103.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajbio.20231103.12,
      author = {Dawit Merga and Lemi Beksisa},
      title = {Mechanisms of Drought Tolerance in Coffee (Coffea arabica L.): Implication for Genetic Improvement Program: Review},
      journal = {American Journal of BioScience},
      volume = {11},
      number = {3},
      pages = {63-70},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajbio.20231103.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20231103.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbio.20231103.12},
      abstract = {Drought is a limiting factor of coffee production and industry worldwide which result 40-80% yield loses. The most substantial solution for this factor is developing tolerant coffee variety. In order to design genetic improvement program, understanding the mechanisms exhibited by drought tolerant and desirable traits involved in coffee genotypes under drought stress is priority issue. Thus, the present review article was conducted with the intension to assess and to understand the drought tolerance mechanisms revealed in coffee for further genetic improvement program. So far, the achieved research results on drought tolerance mechanisms of coffee such as morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanisms were clearly discussed in this article. Drought tolerant coffee genotypes exhibited deep root, reduce leaf area and even shade leaf, control on stomatal conductance and leaf transpiration under water deficit. Under drought stress, several biochemical accumulation such as sugar, amino acid, carbon metabolism enzymes Viz sucrose synthase and phosphofructokinase were confirmed in drought tolerant coffee which favor osmoregulation and enable desiccation tolerance. Coffee breeders’ experts should be conscious these desirable traits during coffee genetic improvement for drought tolerance. In Arabica coffee, CaERF017 is the most expressed gene under low temperature and drought stress. Generally, many genes identified in Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora that response to drought stress which are essential for intra and inter- cross for genetic enhancement and developing drought tolerant coffee variety.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Mechanisms of Drought Tolerance in Coffee (Coffea arabica L.): Implication for Genetic Improvement Program: Review
    AU  - Dawit Merga
    AU  - Lemi Beksisa
    Y1  - 2023/06/27
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20231103.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajbio.20231103.12
    T2  - American Journal of BioScience
    JF  - American Journal of BioScience
    JO  - American Journal of BioScience
    SP  - 63
    EP  - 70
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0167
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20231103.12
    AB  - Drought is a limiting factor of coffee production and industry worldwide which result 40-80% yield loses. The most substantial solution for this factor is developing tolerant coffee variety. In order to design genetic improvement program, understanding the mechanisms exhibited by drought tolerant and desirable traits involved in coffee genotypes under drought stress is priority issue. Thus, the present review article was conducted with the intension to assess and to understand the drought tolerance mechanisms revealed in coffee for further genetic improvement program. So far, the achieved research results on drought tolerance mechanisms of coffee such as morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanisms were clearly discussed in this article. Drought tolerant coffee genotypes exhibited deep root, reduce leaf area and even shade leaf, control on stomatal conductance and leaf transpiration under water deficit. Under drought stress, several biochemical accumulation such as sugar, amino acid, carbon metabolism enzymes Viz sucrose synthase and phosphofructokinase were confirmed in drought tolerant coffee which favor osmoregulation and enable desiccation tolerance. Coffee breeders’ experts should be conscious these desirable traits during coffee genetic improvement for drought tolerance. In Arabica coffee, CaERF017 is the most expressed gene under low temperature and drought stress. Generally, many genes identified in Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora that response to drought stress which are essential for intra and inter- cross for genetic enhancement and developing drought tolerant coffee variety.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia

  • Sections