| Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation of Forage Legumes on Feed Intake, Growth Performance and Economic Feasibility of Borana Bucks Supplemented Natural Grass Hay as Basal Diet

Received: 15 September 2021    Accepted: 12 October 2021    Published: 15 January 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The current experiment was performed using twenty (20) Borana bucks with 17.12 kg initial live body weight at on-station of Yabello Research Center. The aim of this experiment was to conduct the live weight change, nutrient and dry matter intake within economic viability of Borana bucks feed Lablab purpureus, Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and their mixture fed a basal diet of natural grass hay. Experiment consist seventeen (70) days feeding trial excluding two weeks of adaptation period to treatment diet. Experimental animals grouped into four blocks of five animals in each block to their respective treatment diet according to their body weight. Treatments diet arranged as T1 (400gm Cowpea+ ad-lib Natural grass hay), T2 (300gm Lablab + ad-lib Natural grass hay), T3 (267gm Cow pea+100gm lablab + ad-lib Natural grass hay) and T4 (100gm Cow pea+225gm lablab + ad-lib Natural grass hay). All Experimental bucks had free access to hay. Daily feed intake was measured and live body weight changes of experimental bucks were taken ten by ten days interval. The basal diet intakes of experimental bucks were higher in T2, T4 T3 and T1 accordingly. Experimental bucks had significantly affected by treatments and nutrient composition. Therefore, experimental bucks under T2 had higher (69.6g/d) than T4 (64g/d), T3 (53.22g/day) and T1 (51.79 g/day) respectively. Besides to this T1 (0.09) and T3 (0.08) shows lowest feed conversion efficiency and highest feed conversion ratio as compared to the other treatments. Treatment T2 (0.09) and T4 (0.08) shows highest feed conversion efficiency and lowest feed conversion ratio as compared to the other treatments According to the current finding total dry matter intake based up on percent body weight (%BW) and dry matter intake based on metabolic body weight (g/kgW0.75) indicate significance difference in the treatments groups.. T1 has highest total variable cost in the current study followed by experimental animals in T4, T2 and T3 respectively. Bucks under T2 with T4 had indicates more profitable marginal rate of return more than T1 and T3. So, providing additional feed through preserving/growing forage during rainy season especially at lowland area is crucial. Therefore, the current study indicate that supplementation of forage legumes during dry season is biologically acceptable and economically tangible especially an area where feed shortage is critically scarce.

Published in American Journal of BioScience (Volume 10, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajbio.20221001.12
Page(s) 10-16
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Cow Pea, Lablab Purpureus, Marginal Rate Return, Viable

References
[1] Adu, I. F., Fajemisin, B. A. and Adamu, A. M. (1990): The utilization of sorghum fed to sheep as influenced by urea or graded levels of lablab supplementation. National Animal Production Research Institute Ahmadu Bello University, Shika-Zaria.
[2] Ajebu Nurfeta, Adugna Tolera, Eik, L. O. and Sundstol, F. 2008. Feeding value of enset (Ensete ventricosum), Desmodium intortum hay and untreated or urea and calcium oxide treated wheat straw for sheep. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 93: 94-104.
[3] Alemayehu Mengistu, 2003. Immediate cause of the famine; the conflict dimension. Proceeding of the roundtable on drought and famine in the Pastoral Regions. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 23-23 December 2002. Pastoral Forum of Ethiopia.
[4] Babayemi, O. J., Ajayi, F. T., Taiwo, A. A., Bamikole, M. A. and Fajimi, A. K. 2006. Performance of West African dwarf goats fed Panicum maximum and concentrate diets supplemented with lablab (Lablab purpureus), leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) and Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium) foliage. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production 33: 102-111.
[5] Brown, L., Hindmarsh, R. and Mcgregor, R. 2001. Dynamic Agricultural book three (2nd Ed.) McGraw-Hill Book Company, Sydney, 357p.
[6] Coppock, D. 1994. The Borana plateau of southern Ethiopia: Synthesis of pastoral research development and change, 1980-91. ILCA (International Livestock Center for Africa), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 5: 150-160.
[7] CSA (Central Statistical Agency). 2015. Agricultural Sample Survey, Volume II: Report on Livestock and livestock characteristics (Private peasant holdings). Statistical Bulletin 578. Central Statistical Agency (CSA), Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa.
[8] Ewnetu Ermias, 1999. Between and within breed variations in feed intake and fat deposition, and genetic associations of these with some production traits in Menz and Horro sheep. An MSc Thesis Presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Alemaya University. pp. 149-152.
[9] Getachew Asefa, 2005. Evaluation of forage yield and effect of forms of feeding of Acacia saligniaon intake and live weight gain of Farta sheep fed on grass hay. An MSc Thesis Presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Alemaya University. 66p.
[10] Gulten, K., Rad, F. and Kindir, M. 2000. Growth performance and feed conversion efficiency of Siberian Sturger juveniles (Acipenser baeri) Reared in concentrate ways. Turkeys Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 24: 2.
[11] Jemberu Dessie. 2008. Effects of Supplementation of Simada Sheep with Graded levels of Concentrate cake on feed intake, Digestibility and Body weight parameters. MS.c. Thesis Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.
[12] Mc Donald, P., Edwards, R. A., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Morgan, C. A. 2002. Animal Nutrition, 6th (edn). Prentice Hall, Harlow, England, London. 693p.
[13] Minson, D. J. 1990. Nutritional difference between tropical and temperate pastures. In: Grazing animals. Ed. Morley, F. H. W., C. A. B., Furnham Royal, Slough, UK. pp. 167-182.
[14] Mokoboki, H. K., Ndlovu, L. R., Nǵambi, J. W., Malatje, M. M., and Nikolova, R. V. 2005. Nutritive Value of Acacia Tree Foliages Growing in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. South African Journal of Animal Science 35 (4).
[15] Mulu M (2005). Effect of feeding different levels of brewery dried grain on live Weight gain and carcass characteristic of Wogera sheep fed on basal diet. M.Sc. Thesis Presented to the School of Graduate Study of Alemaya University 54.
[16] Mudunuru et al., 2008).. In: Proceedings of the First Biennial Conference of the African Small Ruminant Research Network, ILRAD, Nairobi, Kenya 10-14 December 1990.
[17] Niguse Gebru, 2014. Effects of supplementing chopped euphorbia tirucalli twigs and dry acacia albida pods on carcass characteristics of goats. Ind. J. Sci. Res. and Tech. 2014 2 (2): 104-110. ISSN:-2321-9262 (on-line).
[18] Rai, S. N., Mudgal, V. D., 1996. Effect of alkali and (or) steam treatment of wheat straw or cellulose augmented concentrate mixture on rumen fermentation in goats. Small Ruminant Research. 19, 219-225.
[19] Ranjhan, S. K. 1997. Animal Nutrition in the Tropics. 4th ed. Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. pp. 30-57.
[20] Reyes S. N., Spörndly, E. and Ledin, I. 2006. Effect of feeding different levels of foliage of Moringa oleifera to creole dairy cows on intake, digestibility, milk production and composition. Livestock Science 101: 24-31.
[21] SAS (Statistical Analysis System), 2002. SAS/STAT Guide to personal computers, Version 9. Statistical analysis system institute Inc., Nc. USA.
[22] Simret B. 2005. Supplementation of Graded Levels of Peanut Cake and Wheat Bran Mixture on Nutrient Utilization and Carcass Parameters of Somali Goats. M.Sc. Thesis Presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Alemaya University 61.
[23] Sisay Kumsa, Tamirat Tasemma, Dereje Teshoma. 2019. Feed intake, digestibility and body weight gain of intact male borana goats supplemented with three browse species mixed with wheat bran. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. 6 (5): 51-64.
[24] Upton, M. 1979. Farm Management in Africa: The Principle of Production and Planning. Oxford University Press, Great Britain, pp. 282-298.
[25] Van Soest, P. J., 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nded. University Press, London.
[26] Van Soest, P. J. 1991. Method for dietary neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 3583-3597.
[27] Yohannes Urgesa. 2011. Supplementation of different level of corn silage with linseed meal on performance of black head Ogaden sheep fed grass hay. An MSc Thesis Presented to School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University. Pp. 30-40.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Sisay Kumsa, Tamirat Tasemma, Bantayehu Muluneh. (2022). Evaluation of Forage Legumes on Feed Intake, Growth Performance and Economic Feasibility of Borana Bucks Supplemented Natural Grass Hay as Basal Diet. American Journal of BioScience, 10(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20221001.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Sisay Kumsa; Tamirat Tasemma; Bantayehu Muluneh. Evaluation of Forage Legumes on Feed Intake, Growth Performance and Economic Feasibility of Borana Bucks Supplemented Natural Grass Hay as Basal Diet. Am. J. BioScience 2022, 10(1), 10-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20221001.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Sisay Kumsa, Tamirat Tasemma, Bantayehu Muluneh. Evaluation of Forage Legumes on Feed Intake, Growth Performance and Economic Feasibility of Borana Bucks Supplemented Natural Grass Hay as Basal Diet. Am J BioScience. 2022;10(1):10-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20221001.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajbio.20221001.12,
      author = {Sisay Kumsa and Tamirat Tasemma and Bantayehu Muluneh},
      title = {Evaluation of Forage Legumes on Feed Intake, Growth Performance and Economic Feasibility of Borana Bucks Supplemented Natural Grass Hay as Basal Diet},
      journal = {American Journal of BioScience},
      volume = {10},
      number = {1},
      pages = {10-16},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajbio.20221001.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20221001.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbio.20221001.12},
      abstract = {The current experiment was performed using twenty (20) Borana bucks with 17.12 kg initial live body weight at on-station of Yabello Research Center. The aim of this experiment was to conduct the live weight change, nutrient and dry matter intake within economic viability of Borana bucks feed Lablab purpureus, Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and their mixture fed a basal diet of natural grass hay. Experiment consist seventeen (70) days feeding trial excluding two weeks of adaptation period to treatment diet. Experimental animals grouped into four blocks of five animals in each block to their respective treatment diet according to their body weight. Treatments diet arranged as T1 (400gm Cowpea+ ad-lib Natural grass hay), T2 (300gm Lablab + ad-lib Natural grass hay), T3 (267gm Cow pea+100gm lablab + ad-lib Natural grass hay) and T4 (100gm Cow pea+225gm lablab + ad-lib Natural grass hay). All Experimental bucks had free access to hay. Daily feed intake was measured and live body weight changes of experimental bucks were taken ten by ten days interval. The basal diet intakes of experimental bucks were higher in T2, T4 T3 and T1 accordingly. Experimental bucks had significantly affected by treatments and nutrient composition. Therefore, experimental bucks under T2 had higher (69.6g/d) than T4 (64g/d), T3 (53.22g/day) and T1 (51.79 g/day) respectively. Besides to this T1 (0.09) and T3 (0.08) shows lowest feed conversion efficiency and highest feed conversion ratio as compared to the other treatments. Treatment T2 (0.09) and T4 (0.08) shows highest feed conversion efficiency and lowest feed conversion ratio as compared to the other treatments According to the current finding total dry matter intake based up on percent body weight (%BW) and dry matter intake based on metabolic body weight (g/kgW0.75) indicate significance difference in the treatments groups.. T1 has highest total variable cost in the current study followed by experimental animals in T4, T2 and T3 respectively. Bucks under T2 with T4 had indicates more profitable marginal rate of return more than T1 and T3. So, providing additional feed through preserving/growing forage during rainy season especially at lowland area is crucial. Therefore, the current study indicate that supplementation of forage legumes during dry season is biologically acceptable and economically tangible especially an area where feed shortage is critically scarce.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Evaluation of Forage Legumes on Feed Intake, Growth Performance and Economic Feasibility of Borana Bucks Supplemented Natural Grass Hay as Basal Diet
    AU  - Sisay Kumsa
    AU  - Tamirat Tasemma
    AU  - Bantayehu Muluneh
    Y1  - 2022/01/15
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20221001.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajbio.20221001.12
    T2  - American Journal of BioScience
    JF  - American Journal of BioScience
    JO  - American Journal of BioScience
    SP  - 10
    EP  - 16
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0167
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20221001.12
    AB  - The current experiment was performed using twenty (20) Borana bucks with 17.12 kg initial live body weight at on-station of Yabello Research Center. The aim of this experiment was to conduct the live weight change, nutrient and dry matter intake within economic viability of Borana bucks feed Lablab purpureus, Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and their mixture fed a basal diet of natural grass hay. Experiment consist seventeen (70) days feeding trial excluding two weeks of adaptation period to treatment diet. Experimental animals grouped into four blocks of five animals in each block to their respective treatment diet according to their body weight. Treatments diet arranged as T1 (400gm Cowpea+ ad-lib Natural grass hay), T2 (300gm Lablab + ad-lib Natural grass hay), T3 (267gm Cow pea+100gm lablab + ad-lib Natural grass hay) and T4 (100gm Cow pea+225gm lablab + ad-lib Natural grass hay). All Experimental bucks had free access to hay. Daily feed intake was measured and live body weight changes of experimental bucks were taken ten by ten days interval. The basal diet intakes of experimental bucks were higher in T2, T4 T3 and T1 accordingly. Experimental bucks had significantly affected by treatments and nutrient composition. Therefore, experimental bucks under T2 had higher (69.6g/d) than T4 (64g/d), T3 (53.22g/day) and T1 (51.79 g/day) respectively. Besides to this T1 (0.09) and T3 (0.08) shows lowest feed conversion efficiency and highest feed conversion ratio as compared to the other treatments. Treatment T2 (0.09) and T4 (0.08) shows highest feed conversion efficiency and lowest feed conversion ratio as compared to the other treatments According to the current finding total dry matter intake based up on percent body weight (%BW) and dry matter intake based on metabolic body weight (g/kgW0.75) indicate significance difference in the treatments groups.. T1 has highest total variable cost in the current study followed by experimental animals in T4, T2 and T3 respectively. Bucks under T2 with T4 had indicates more profitable marginal rate of return more than T1 and T3. So, providing additional feed through preserving/growing forage during rainy season especially at lowland area is crucial. Therefore, the current study indicate that supplementation of forage legumes during dry season is biologically acceptable and economically tangible especially an area where feed shortage is critically scarce.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center, Borana, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center, Borana, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center, Borana, Ethiopia

  • Sections