| Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation of NPSB Fertilizer Levels on Yield and Yield Components of Open Pollinated Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties Under Irrigated Condition in South Omo Zone

Received: 31 March 2021    Accepted: 2 June 2021    Published: 10 June 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Maize is a significant cereal crop in Ethiopia. However, the yield of this crop is limited due to lack of varieties and blended fertilizer for varieties and site specifications. The use of exact amount of fertilizer based on crop requirement has significant importance for sustainable crop production. A study was undertaken to investigate the effects of NPSB blended fertilizer rate for maize yield production in Dasenech and Nyangatom districts in the lowland area of South Omo Zone, Southern Ethiopia during the 2019/2020 cropping season. The experiment was factorial with three maize varieties (Melkassa-6Q Melkassa-4 and Melkassa-2) and four NPSB blended fertilizer rates including kg ha-1 (none fertilizer, 50NPSB, 100NPSB and 150 NPSB). Factorial combinations were used as twelve treatments laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Growth, yield and yield components parameters were recorded and carried out statistical analysis The result of analysis of variance revealed that the interaction effect of varieties and blended fertilizer rate highly significant difference in grain yield. The result showed that the highest grain yield (3913.3 kg ha-1) and net benefit (49,229.6 Eth-birr ha-1) with MRR of 2525.83% were obtained from Melkassa-2 variety treated with 100 kg ha-1of NPSB fertilizer rates at Dasenech location. Whereas, at Nyangatom location, the highest grain yield (4906.7 kg ha-1) and net benefit (62640.45Eth-birr ha-1) with MRR of 2926.2% were obtained from similar Melkassa-2 variety treated with 100 kg ha-1 of NPSB fertilizer levels s. Therefore, based on the result recorded from this study Melkassa-2 varieties treated with 100 kg ha-1 of NPSB blended fertilizer can be suggested as profitable for the production of maize at both districts of the study areas and their similar soil conditions and agro-ecology.

Published in American Journal of BioScience (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajbio.20210903.13
Page(s) 86-94
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

NPSB Fertilizer, Open Pollinated Maize Varieties, Profitability, Grain Yield

References
[1] Dowswell, C. R, R. L Paliwal and R. P. Cantrell 1996. Maize in 3rd World. West Views press, Inc. Colorado, USA.
[2] Haffanaghel, H. P. 1961. Agriculture in Ethiopia. FAO, Rome.
[3] FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database). 2017. Statistical databases and data-sets of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx.
[4] Akalu T. 2015. On-farm Evaluation of Improved Maize Varieties in Ethiopia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237309549.
[5] CSA (Central Statistical Agency). 2017. Report on area and production of crops (private peasant holdings ‘Meher’ season) 2016/2017. Addis Ababa Ethiopia, the FDRE statistical bulletin, Vol. I. Statistical Bulletin 584, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, April 2017. Pp. 1-12.
[6] MOANR (Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources). 2017. Plant variety release, protection and seed quality control directorate. Addis Abeba, Ethiopia.
[7] Orkaido Olte (2004) Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizers on Yield And Yield Components of Maize (Zea Mays L.) on Black Soil of Regede Konso Alemaya University at Konso special wereda, southern Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis Presented to Haramaya University, Ethiopia.
[8] Delorite, R. J. and H. L. Ahlgren. 1967. Crop production. 3rd (ed.). Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
[9] Onasanya, R. O., Aiyelari, O. P., Onasanya, A. S., Oikeh, F. E., & Oyelakin, O. O. (2009). Growth and yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers in Southern Nigeria. IDOSI Publications, 5 (4), 400–407.
[10] Chimdessa, D. (2016). Blended fertilizers effects on maize yield and yield components of Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 5 (5), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20160505.13.
[11] Bouyoucos J (1962). Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soil. Agronomy Journals 54: 464-465.
[12] Van Reeuwijk, L. P., 1992. Procedures for soil analysis, 3rd Ed. International Soil Reference and Information Center (ISRIC), Wageningen, the Netherlands. 34p.
[13] Black, C. A, 1965. Methods of soil analysis. Part I, American Society of Agronomy. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 1572p.
[14] Ranst, V. E., M. Verloo, A. Demeyer and J. M. Pauwels, 1999. Manual for the Soil Chemistry and Fertility Laboratory. Belgium. 245p.
[15] Olsen R, Cole S, Watanabe F, Dean L (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture Circ. 939.
[16] USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), 1984. Procedures for Collecting Soil Samples and Methods of Analysis for Soil Survey. Soil Survey. Invest. Rep. 1. (Rev.) U.S. Gov. Print Office, Washington, DC.
[17] Kenneth Hellevang. 1995. Grain Moisture Content Effects and Management. North Dakota State Extension Publication AE-905. http://www.ag.ndsu.edu/extensionaben/documents/ae905.pdf. [Accessed March 2021].
[18] Donald C. M., 1962. In search of yield. Journal of Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 28: 171-178. Egbe O., Alibo S. and Nwueze I. 2010. Evaluation of some extra-early and early maturing cowpea varieties for intercropping with maize in Southern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal, 1: 845-458.
[19] SAS (Statistical Analysis System). 2008. Statistical Analysis System. SAS institute version 9.20 Cary, NC, USA.
[20] CIMMYT (Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo/International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center). (1988). from agronomic data to farmer's recommendations: an economics training manual. Completely revised edition, CIMMYT, Mexico. D. F. 79 pp.
[21] Ethio SIS. 2014. Soil fertility status and fertilizer recommendation atlas for Tigray regional state, Ethiopia. July 2014, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethio SIS. 2015. http://www.ata.gov.et/highlighted-deliverables/ethiopian-soil-information-system-ethiosis/. Date accessed: 19 March 2021.
[22] Tekalign M (1991). Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure and compost analysis. Working Document No. 13. International Livestock Research Center for Africa, Addis Ababa.
[23] Berry, D. P., Dillon, P., Rath, M. and Horan, B., 2007. Influence of Holstein-Friesian strain and feed system on body weight and body condition score lactation profiles. Journal of Dairy Science, 90 (4), pp. 1859-1869.
[24] FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). 2014. The world reference base for soil resources. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, Rome.
[25] Kinfe Tekulu, Tsadik Tadele, Tewolde Berhe, Weldegebreal Gebrehiwot, Gebresemaeti Kahsu, Solomon Mebrahtom and Goitom Aregawi. 2019. Evaluation of NPSZnB fertilizer levels on yield and yield component of maize (Zea mays L.) at Laelay Adiyabo and Medebay Zana districts, Western Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Cereals and Oilseeds. Vol. 10 (2), pp. 54-63.
[26] Jeet, S., Singh, J. P., Kumar, R., Prasad, R. K., Kumar, P., Kumari, A. and Prakash, P., 2012. Effect of nitrogen and Sulphur levels on yield, economics and quality of QPM hybrids under dryland conditions of Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4 (9), Pp. 31.
[27] Mekuannet Belay and Kiya Adare (2020). Response of growth, yield components, and yield of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) varieties to newly introduce blended NPS and N fertilizer rates at Haramaya, Eastern Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 6: 1771115. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1771115
[28] Tolera A, Tolessa D and Dagne W. (2017). Effects of Varieties and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield and Yield Components of Maize on Farmers Field in Mid Altitude Areas of Western Ethiopia. International Journal of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4253917.
[29] Singh, R., & Daoudi, M. (2017). Effect of nitrogen and Sulphur on growth and yield of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6 (6), 1930–1935 https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.606.22
[30] Dagne C (2016). Blended fertilizers effects on maize yield and yield components of Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 5 (5): 151-162. doi: 10.11648/jaff.20160505.13.
[31] Jafer D 2018. Validation of blended fertilizer for maize production under limed condition of acid soil. Journal of Natural Sciences Research 8 (23): 52-58.
[32] Ahmad, A., Usman, M., Ullah, E., & Warraich, E. A. (2003). Effects of different phosphorus levels on the growth and yield of two cultivars of maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 5 (4), 632-634. http://www.ijab.org
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Awoke Tadesse, Muhaba Sultan. (2021). Evaluation of NPSB Fertilizer Levels on Yield and Yield Components of Open Pollinated Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties Under Irrigated Condition in South Omo Zone. American Journal of BioScience, 9(3), 86-94. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210903.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Awoke Tadesse; Muhaba Sultan. Evaluation of NPSB Fertilizer Levels on Yield and Yield Components of Open Pollinated Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties Under Irrigated Condition in South Omo Zone. Am. J. BioScience 2021, 9(3), 86-94. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20210903.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Awoke Tadesse, Muhaba Sultan. Evaluation of NPSB Fertilizer Levels on Yield and Yield Components of Open Pollinated Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties Under Irrigated Condition in South Omo Zone. Am J BioScience. 2021;9(3):86-94. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20210903.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajbio.20210903.13,
      author = {Awoke Tadesse and Muhaba Sultan},
      title = {Evaluation of NPSB Fertilizer Levels on Yield and Yield Components of Open Pollinated Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties Under Irrigated Condition in South Omo Zone},
      journal = {American Journal of BioScience},
      volume = {9},
      number = {3},
      pages = {86-94},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajbio.20210903.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210903.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbio.20210903.13},
      abstract = {Maize is a significant cereal crop in Ethiopia. However, the yield of this crop is limited due to lack of varieties and blended fertilizer for varieties and site specifications. The use of exact amount of fertilizer based on crop requirement has significant importance for sustainable crop production. A study was undertaken to investigate the effects of NPSB blended fertilizer rate for maize yield production in Dasenech and Nyangatom districts in the lowland area of South Omo Zone, Southern Ethiopia during the 2019/2020 cropping season. The experiment was factorial with three maize varieties (Melkassa-6Q Melkassa-4 and Melkassa-2) and four NPSB blended fertilizer rates including kg ha-1 (none fertilizer, 50NPSB, 100NPSB and 150 NPSB). Factorial combinations were used as twelve treatments laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Growth, yield and yield components parameters were recorded and carried out statistical analysis The result of analysis of variance revealed that the interaction effect of varieties and blended fertilizer rate highly significant difference in grain yield. The result showed that the highest grain yield (3913.3 kg ha-1) and net benefit (49,229.6 Eth-birr ha-1) with MRR of 2525.83% were obtained from Melkassa-2 variety treated with 100 kg ha-1of NPSB fertilizer rates at Dasenech location. Whereas, at Nyangatom location, the highest grain yield (4906.7 kg ha-1) and net benefit (62640.45Eth-birr ha-1) with MRR of 2926.2% were obtained from similar Melkassa-2 variety treated with 100 kg ha-1 of NPSB fertilizer levels s. Therefore, based on the result recorded from this study Melkassa-2 varieties treated with 100 kg ha-1 of NPSB blended fertilizer can be suggested as profitable for the production of maize at both districts of the study areas and their similar soil conditions and agro-ecology.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Evaluation of NPSB Fertilizer Levels on Yield and Yield Components of Open Pollinated Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties Under Irrigated Condition in South Omo Zone
    AU  - Awoke Tadesse
    AU  - Muhaba Sultan
    Y1  - 2021/06/10
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210903.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajbio.20210903.13
    T2  - American Journal of BioScience
    JF  - American Journal of BioScience
    JO  - American Journal of BioScience
    SP  - 86
    EP  - 94
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0167
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210903.13
    AB  - Maize is a significant cereal crop in Ethiopia. However, the yield of this crop is limited due to lack of varieties and blended fertilizer for varieties and site specifications. The use of exact amount of fertilizer based on crop requirement has significant importance for sustainable crop production. A study was undertaken to investigate the effects of NPSB blended fertilizer rate for maize yield production in Dasenech and Nyangatom districts in the lowland area of South Omo Zone, Southern Ethiopia during the 2019/2020 cropping season. The experiment was factorial with three maize varieties (Melkassa-6Q Melkassa-4 and Melkassa-2) and four NPSB blended fertilizer rates including kg ha-1 (none fertilizer, 50NPSB, 100NPSB and 150 NPSB). Factorial combinations were used as twelve treatments laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Growth, yield and yield components parameters were recorded and carried out statistical analysis The result of analysis of variance revealed that the interaction effect of varieties and blended fertilizer rate highly significant difference in grain yield. The result showed that the highest grain yield (3913.3 kg ha-1) and net benefit (49,229.6 Eth-birr ha-1) with MRR of 2525.83% were obtained from Melkassa-2 variety treated with 100 kg ha-1of NPSB fertilizer rates at Dasenech location. Whereas, at Nyangatom location, the highest grain yield (4906.7 kg ha-1) and net benefit (62640.45Eth-birr ha-1) with MRR of 2926.2% were obtained from similar Melkassa-2 variety treated with 100 kg ha-1 of NPSB fertilizer levels s. Therefore, based on the result recorded from this study Melkassa-2 varieties treated with 100 kg ha-1 of NPSB blended fertilizer can be suggested as profitable for the production of maize at both districts of the study areas and their similar soil conditions and agro-ecology.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Agronomy, Southern Agricultural Research Institute, Jinka Agricultural Research Center, Jinka, Ethiopia

  • Department Soil Science, Southern Agricultural Research Institute, Jinka Agricultural Research Center, Jinka, Ethiopia

  • Sections